Cert IV TAA - Course
Unit TAAASS404B
Participate in
assessment
validation
(information sourced
from NTIS website
http://www.ntis.gov.au/)
Description
This unit specifies the
competence required to
participate in an assessment
validation process.
Employability Skills
This unit contains
employability skills.
Application Of Unit
Validation is a process
involving assessors working
in collaboration to review,
compare and evaluate their
assessment process and their
assessment outcomes in
relation to the same unit/s
of competency. This includes
validating assessment
methods/tools, the evidence
that was collected using
these assessment
methods/tools and the
interpretation of that
evidence to make a judgement
of competence.
Validation forms part of
the quality systems of the
training/ and/or assessment
organisation (refer to
definition in the Range
Statement) and is undertaken
to improve the quality of
the assessment process.
Validation may be
undertaken prior to and post
the assessment of candidates
and includes validation of
formative and summative
assessment activities (the
latter includes assessment
for recognition purposes).
Validation may be an
internal process involving
assessors from the same
training and/or assessment
organisation, or it may
occur as an external
exercise involving assessors
from different
organisations.
This unit focuses on the
skills and knowledge needed
to participate in assessment
validation. It does not
address the competence of
leading the validation
process - that function is
addressed in TAAASS501B Lead
and coordinate assessment
systems and services.
The achievement of this
unit includes interpretation
of competency standards
(where competency standards
are used as the benchmarks
for assessment). TAADES401B
Use Training Packages to
meet client needs addresses
this skill in depth.
Achievement of this unit
requires competence in
conducting assessment.
Therefore TAAASS402B Assess
competence is a
prerequisite/co-requisite
unit.
Interpretation of the
effectiveness of the
assessment plan and
selected/modified assessment
tools also forms part of
this unit of competency.
Therefore, competence in the
following units is also
highly recommended.
TAAASS401B Plan and
organise assessment
TAAASS403B Develop
assessment tools
The competence specified
in this unit is typically
required by assessors, lead
assessors, training and/or
assessment consultants.
Unit Sector
Assessment
Performance criteria
|
Element |
|
Performance
criteria |
| 1. |
Prepare for
validation |
|
|
1.1 |
The
purpose,
focus
and
context
of
validation
is confirmed
and
discussed
with
relevant
people
|
|
1.2 |
The
approach to
validation
is discussed
and
confirmed in
accordance
with the
defined
purpose/s,
context,
relevant
assessment
system
policies
and
procedures
and
organisational/
legal/ethical
requirements
|
|
1.3 |
Relevant
benchmarks
for
assessment
are analysed
and the
evidence
needed to
demonstrate
that
competency
is
collectively
agreed
|
|
1.4 |
Any
related
documentation
relevant to
validation
proceedings
is
identified
and
collectively
agreed
|
|
1.5 |
Material/s
to be used
in
validation
sessions are
obtained,
read and
interpreted
and
validation
activities
collectively
agreed
|
|
| 2. |
Contribute to
validation process |
|
|
2.1 |
Active
participation
in
validation
sessions and
activities
is
demonstrated
using
appropriate
communications
skills
|
|
2.2 |
Participation
in
validation
sessions and
activities,
includes the
review,
comparison
and
evaluation
of:
|
2.2.1 |
the
overall
assessment
process
|
|
2.2.2 |
assessment
plans
|
|
2.2.3 |
interpretation
of
competency
standards
or
other
benchmarks
for
assessment
|
|
2.2.4 |
selection
and
application
of
assessment
methods
|
|
2.2.5 |
selection
and
use
of
assessment
tools
|
|
2.2.6 |
the
collected
evidence
|
|
2.2.7 |
assessment
decisions
including
the
exercise
of
judgement
|
|
|
2.3 |
The review,
comparison
and
evaluation
is
undertaken
in
accordance
with the
principles
of
assessment
and rules
of evidence
|
|
2.4 |
All
documents
used in the
validation
process are
checked for
accuracy and
version
control
|
|
| 3. |
Contribute to
validation outcomes |
|
|
3.1 |
Validation
findings are
collectively
discussed,
analysed and
agreed to
support
improvements
in the
quality of
assessment
|
|
3.2 |
Recommendations
to improve
assessment
practice are
discussed,
agreed and
recorded
|
|
3.3 |
Changes to
own
assessment
practice,
arising from
validation
and
appropriate
to
assessment
role and
responsibilities,
are
implemented
|
|
Skills and Knowledge
Required skills:
Required skills and
attributes include:
-
research skills to:
-
evaluation/revision
skills to:
-
determine
evidence
requirements from
competency standards
-
review assessment
process
-
review assessment
methods and tools
-
review collected
evidence
-
literacy skills to:
-
observation skills
to:
-
evaluate and
compare assessment
planning,
organisation,
methods, tools, and
evidence
documentation
leading to
assessment
judgements
-
identify where
improvements to the
assessment process
can be made
-
communications and
interpersonal skills to:
-
effectively
participate and
contribute to validation
activities and sessions
-
collaborate with
colleagues
-
seek and receive
feedback on assessment
practice
-
share sensitive
information
-
maintain
confidentiality of
sensitive information
-
gain and maintain
trust of colleagues
-
provide advice and
support to colleagues
-
planning skills to:
-
problem solving
skills to:
-
identify
information that is
inconsistent,
ambiguous or
contradictory
-
suggest/confirm
recommendations for
improvements in
assessment
Required knowledge:
Required knowledge
includes:
-
what is
competency-based
assessment including
-
vocational
education and
training as a
competency-based
system
-
assessment is
criterion
referenced/distinction
to norm referenced
assessment
-
criterion used in
national VET is
endorsed or
accredited
competency standards
defining
specifications for
performance of
work/work functions
and skills/knowledge
-
reporting of
competency-based
assessment
-
competency
standards as the
basis of
qualifications
-
the principles of
competency-based
assessment
-
the structure and
application of
competency standards
-
how to interpret
competency standards and
other related assessment
information to determine
the evidence needed to
demonstrate competency
including:
-
the components of
competency
-
assessment of
Employability
Skills, dimensions
of competency and
OHS requirements
-
Training Package
Assessment
Guidelines
-
the qualification
level of units
-
Australian
Qualifications Framework
Guidelines including
characteristics of AQF
levels
-
different assessment
methods and which
methods may be
appropriate and relevant
to different units/
different parts of
individual units
-
different types of
assessment tools, what
tools work for what
types of evidence, what
are well constructed
assessment tools and why
-
what are the
principles of assessment
and how they guide
assessment and
validation processes
-
what are the rules of
evidence, why are they
important, particularly
in a validation context
-
the various reasons
for carrying out
validation and the
different approaches to
validation that may be
appropriate:
-
before assessment
-
during assessment
-
after assessment
-
the critical aspects
of validation, including
validation of:
-
different aspects of
quality systems such as:
-
local/relevant
strategies to meet
the AQTF
-
continuous
improvement systems
-
quality assurance
policies and
processes
-
Assessment system
policies and
procedures
-
records
management systems
-
relevant policy,
legislation, codes of
practice and national
standards including
national Commonwealth
and state/territory
legislation for example:
-
Training
Packages/competency
standards/other
assessment
benchmarks
-
licensing
requirements
-
providing
accurate information
-
meeting
environmental
standards
-
industry/workplace
requirements
-
duty of care
under common law
-
recording
information and
confidentiality
requirements
-
anti-discrimination
-
workplace
relations
-
industrial
awards/enterprise
agreements
-
relevant OHS
legislation, codes of
practice, standards and
guidelines, impacting on
assessment
Range statement
|
|
|
|
|
Training
and/or assessment
organisation
refers to:
|
|
-
a Registered
Training
Organisation
(RTO), i.e. an
organisation
registered to
provide
recognised
training and
assessment
services;
includes TAFE
institutes,
private
commercial
colleges/companies,
enterprises,
community
organisations,
group training
companies and
schools
-
an
organisation
working in a
partnership
arrangement with
an RTO to
provide
recognised
training and
assessment
services
-
an
organisation
that provides
non-recognised
training and
assessment
services
|
|
Purpose and
focus of validation
may include:
|
|
-
as part of
organisational
quality
assurance
processes
-
to address an
identified area
of risk in
assessment
practice and
quality
-
to
demonstrate
compliance with
the Australian
Quality Training
Framework (AQTF)
Standards for
Registered
Training
Organisations
(RTOs)
-
to ensure
assessments meet
the evidence
requirements of
the competency
standards or
other assessment
benchmarks
-
to provide
evidence for
external audit
-
to provide
evidence for
internal audit
-
to improve
assessment
practices
-
to evaluate
the quality of
assessment tools
-
to provide
professional
development
-
to increase
assessor
confidence
-
to determine
whether
different
assessors using
the same tools
collect the same
types and levels
of evidence
-
to determine
whether
different
assessors
interpret the
same evidence
similarly
-
to determine
whether
assessment
decisions
reflect the
principles of
assessment and
rules of
evidence
|
|
Context of
validation may
include:
|
|
-
internal to
the
organisation,
e.g. same site
or across sites
-
external to
the
organisation,
e.g. in a
industry,
region, city,
state, assessor
network
-
through
licensing or
similar body
-
with
co-assessors
-
with
peers/colleagues
from other
training and/or
assessment
organisations
|
|
Relevant
people must
include:
|
|
|
|
Relevant
people may
include:
|
|
-
lead
assessors
-
managers,
supervisors
-
technical and
subject experts,
including
occupational
health and
safety (OHS)
experts and
language,
literacy and
numeracy
specialists
-
personnel or
partners with
responsibilities
for input into
the quality
assurance system
-
training
and/or
assessment
coordinators
-
industry
clients
-
industry
regulators
-
employee and
employer
representatives
-
members of
professional
associations
-
personnel
from a state or
territory
registering body
-
independent
validators
|
|
Approach to
validation may
include:
|
|
-
assessment
panels
-
moderation
meetings
-
collectively
developing/reviewing
banks of
assessment tools
and exemplars
-
benchmarking
-
field
testing,
trialling and
piloting
assessment tools
-
peer review
-
team
assessment
-
internal
audit process
-
client
feedback
mechanisms
-
mentoring of
less experienced
by more
experienced
assessors
-
use of
independent
assessment
validator to
review
validation
processes
|
|
Assessment
system policies and
procedures may
include:
|
|
-
candidate
selection
-
rational and
purpose of
competency-based
assessment
-
assessment
records/data
management/information
management
-
recognition
of current
competency/recognition
of prior
learning/credit
arrangements
-
assessors -
needs,
qualifications,
maintaining
currency
-
assessment
reporting
procedures
-
assessment
appeals
-
candidate
grievances/complaints
-
validation
-
evaluation/internal
audit
-
costs/resourcing
-
access and
equity/reasonable
adjustment
-
partnership
arrangements
-
links with
human resource
or industrial
relations
systems
-
links with
overall quality
management
system
|
|
Organisational/legal/ethical
requirements may
include:
|
|
-
legal and
ethical
responsibilities
of assessors
-
assessment
system policies
and procedures
-
reporting,
recording and
retrieval
systems for
assessment,
including
documenting the
agreed approach
to validation
-
licensing/legal
ramifications of
assessing
competence
-
requirements
of training
and/or
assessment
organisations
relating to
assessment and
validation
-
quality
assurance
systems
-
business and
performance
plans
-
access and
equity policies
and procedures
-
collaborative/partnership
arrangements
-
policies,
procedures and
programs
-
defined
resource
parameters
-
mutual
recognition
arrangements
-
industrial
relations
systems and
processes,
awards/enterprise
agreements
-
AQTF
Standards for
Registered
Training
Organisations
(RTOs), in
particular
Standard 8, RTO
assessment
-
registration
scope
-
human
resource
policies/procedures
and legal
requirements
including
anti-discrimination,
equal
employment, job
role/responsibilities/conditions
-
relevant
industry codes
of practice
-
confidentiality
and privacy
requirements of
information
relating to
completed
assessments
-
OHS
considerations,
including:
|
|
Benchmark/s
for assessment
refers to:
|
|
-
the criterion
against which
the candidate is
assessed which,
may be a
competency
standard/unit of
competency,
assessment
criteria of
course
curricula,
performance
specifications,
product
specifications
|
|
Evidence:
|
|
|
|
Related
documentation
may include:
|
|
-
the
Assessment
Guidelines of
the relevant
Training
Package/s
-
information
from the
competency
standards about
the resources
required for
assessment, the
assessment
context,
appropriate
assessment
methods
-
assessment
activities
identified in
accredited
modules derived
from the
relevant
competency
standards
-
assessment
activities in
Support
Materials
related to the
relevant
competency
standards
-
any
requirements of
OHS,
legislation,
codes of
practice,
standards and
guidelines
-
indicators
and levels of
competence of
the National
Reporting System
-
organisational
requirements for
demonstration of
work performance
-
product
specifications
|
|
Material/s
may include:
|
|
-
assessment
tools
-
samples of
collected
evidence
-
documentation
outlining the
basis of
assessment
decisions
-
reports/records
of assessment
decisions
-
validation
templates
-
validation
checklists
-
assessment
exemplars and
competency
standards
-
sampling
techniques
-
banks of
assessment tools
-
survey
proformas
|
|
Validation
activities may
include:
|
|
-
analysing and
reviewing
assessment tools
-
analysing and
reviewing
collected
evidence
-
analysing and
reviewing
assessment
decisions/records
of assessment
outcomes
-
examining
assessment
records
-
examining
assessment
systems
-
discussing
the assessment
process, issues,
difficulties in
interpretation
-
holding
interviews with
each other or
with management,
trainers/facilitators,
candidates
-
analysing
client feedback
-
observing
assessment
conduct
-
using
validation tools
-
reviewing and
interpreting
Assessment
Guidelines
-
examining
assessor
qualifications
-
analysing
appeals
processes
-
recording
evidence of
validation
processes and
outcomes
|
|
Assessment
process is
defined as:
|
|
|
|
Assessment
plan is the
overall planning
document for the
assessment process
and may include:
|
|
-
the purpose
and aims of the
assessment
-
the context
of assessment
-
relevant
competency
standards to be
used as the
benchmarks for
assessment
-
other
assessment
information/documentation
identified as
relevant
-
identified
personnel
-
identified
assessment
methods and
assessment tools
-
possibilities
for clustering
units of
competency for
assessment
purposes
-
identified
OHS hazards,
including
assessed risks
and control
strategies
-
material
and/or physical
resources
required
-
organisational
arrangements for
conducting
assessment
-
OHS reporting
requirements
-
any special
assessment
needs, e.g.
personal
protective
equipment
requirements
-
outline of
assessment
milestones, time
lines and target
dates
-
candidate
self-assessment
procedures
-
connections
to relevant
organisational
plans, polices
and procedures
|
|
Assessment
methods are the
particular
techniques used to
gather evidence and
may include:
|
|
-
direct
observation, for
example:
-
structured
activities, for
example:
-
questioning,
for example:
-
written
questions,
for example,
on a
computer
-
interviews
-
self-assessment
-
verbal
questioning
-
questionnaires
-
oral or
written
examinations
(applicable
at higher
AQF levels)
-
portfolios,
for example:
-
collections
of work
samples
compiled by
the
candidate
-
product
with
supporting
documentation
-
historical
evidence
-
journal/log
book
-
information
about life
experience
-
review of
products, for
example:
-
third party
feedback, for
example:
-
testimonials/reports
from
employers/supervisors
-
evidence
of training
-
authenticated
prior
achievements
-
interview
with
employer,
supervisor,
peer
|
|
Assessment
tools contain:
|
|
-
the
instruments to
be used for
gathering
evidence such
as:
-
a profile of
acceptable
performance
measures
-
templates/proformas
-
specific
questions or
activities
-
evidence/observation
checklists
-
checklists
for the
evaluation of
work samples
-
candidate
self-assessment
materials
-
the
procedures,
information and
instructions for
the
assessor/candidate
relating to the
use of
assessment
instruments and
the conditions
for assessment
|
|
Judgement is a
two-step process
and means:
|
|
-
the decision
made by the
assessor on
whether the
evidence
provided meets
the principles
of assessment
and rules of
evidence
-
the decision
made by the
assessor, based
on the evidence
provided and
evaluated, on
whether the
candidate is
competent/not
yet competent
|
|
Principles of
assessment are:
|
|
-
validity
-
reliability
-
flexibility
-
fairness
|
|
Rule of
evidence are:
|
|
-
validity
-
sufficiency
-
currency
-
authenticity
|
|
Recommendations for
improvement may
include:
|
|
-
ongoing
professional
development
strategies for
assessors
-
changes to
assessment
system policies
and procedures
-
changes to
assessment
strategies
-
changes to
assessment plans
-
changes to
selected
assessment
methods
-
changes/development
of new
assessment tools
-
improved
records
management
-
changes to
assessment
resources
-
instigation
of/changes to
partnership
arrangements
-
improvements
to evidence
collection
-
provision of
additional
information for
assessors/candidates
-
greater
advice/support/supervision
of assessors
-
exemplars
-
liaison with
technical
experts/specialist
support
|
Evidence guide
|
|
|
|
| Overview of
assessment |
|
To demonstrate
competence against
this unit candidates
must be able to
provide evidence
that they have
actively
participated in and
have contributed to
a minimum of two
validation sessions,
using different
validation
approaches and
validation
activities.
The evidence
provided must:
explain the
validation purpose
and context and the
legal and ethical
responsibilities of
assessors; include
the collation of
documentation to be
submitted to the
validation process;
demonstrate access
and interpretation
of the competency
standard and
evidence
requirements;
demonstrate
communication and
liaison with
relevant people and
participation in
providing feedback
and interpreting
documentation in
validation sessions;
demonstrate how the
critical aspects of
validation were
addressed; show
involvement in
reviewing
findings/outcomes,
including, where
relevant,
contributing to the
finalised validation
documentation.
|
| Products that
could be used as
evidence include: |
|
-
recommendations
as a result of
reviewing
assessments, and
why
-
evaluations
of the quality
of assessment
tools against
the identified
competency
standards
-
evaluations
of the evidence
collected
against
identified
competency
standards, and
whether it meets
the rules of
evidence
-
suggested
recommendations
discussed for
modification
|
| Processes
that could be used
as evidence include: |
|
-
how
competency
standards and
other documents
were interpreted
and evidence
requirements
identified
-
how
assessment
decisions were
evaluated
-
how
assessment
feedback was
collated and
evaluated
-
what
contribution was
made to
validation
activities
|
| Resource
implications for
assessment include: |
|
-
access to
competency
standards and
other related
assessment
documentation
-
access to
completed
assessment tools
-
access to
assessment
reports/records
-
access to
suitable
assessment
validation
venue/equipment
-
access to a
validation group
-
access to
relevant
workplace
documentation
-
cost/time
considerations
-
meeting
personnel
requirements
retime
management
|
| The
collection of
quality evidence
requires that: |
|
-
assessment
must address the
scope of this
unit and reflect
all components
of the unit i.e.
the Elements,
Performance
Criteria, Range
Statement,
Evidence Guide,
Employability
Skills
-
a range of
appropriate
assessment
methods/evidence
gathering
techniques is
used to
determine
competency
-
evidence must
be gathered in
the workplace
whenever
possible. Where
no workplace is
available, a
simulated
workplace must
be provided
-
the evidence
collected must
relate to a
number of
performances
assessed at
different points
in time and in a
learning and
assessment
pathway these
must be
separated by
further learning
and practice
-
assessment
meets the rules
of evidence
-
a judgement
of competence
should only be
made when the
assessor is
confident that
the required
outcomes of the
unit have been
achieved and
that consistent
performance has
been
demonstrated
|
| Specific
evidence
requirements must
include: |
|
-
active
participation in
a minimum of two
validation
sessions/meetings
which, in
combination,
address the
critical aspects
of validation
using different
validation
approaches and
activities
-
clear
explanations of
the purposes of
validation and
the legal and
ethical
responsibilities
of assessors
-
collation of
all
documentation
relating to the
validation
process in a
logical manner
-
demonstration
of
communications
and liaison with
relevant people
-
provision of
feedback and
interpretation
of documentation
in validation
sessions
-
record of
contribution to
validation
findings
|
| Integrated
assessment means
that: |
|
|
|
The whole
competency standard
refers to:
|
|
|
Evidence guide
|
|
|
|
| Overview of
assessment |
|
To demonstrate
competency against
this unit candidates
must be able to
provide evidence
that they can
source, analyse,
interpret and use a
Training Package and
an accredited course
to contextualise or
adapt competency
standards for an
industry,
organisation or
individual.
|
| Products that
could be used as
evidence include: |
|
|
| Processes
that could be used
as evidence include: |
|
-
how different
components of
the Training
Package and/or
accredited
courses were
analysed
-
how different
parts of the
competency
standards were
analysed
-
how the
Training
Package/s and/or
accredited
courses were
used to meet the
needs of a
particular
industry or
organisation
-
how Training
Package/s and/or
accredited
courses operate
in vocational
education and
training
|
| Resource
implications for
assessment include: |
|
|
| The
collection of
quality evidence
requires that: |
|
-
assessment
must address the
scope of this
unit and reflect
all components
of the unit i.e.
the Elements,
Performance
Criteria, Range
Statement,
Evidence Guide,
Employability
Skills
-
a range of
appropriate
assessment
methods/evidence
gathering
techniques is
used to
determine
competency
-
evidence must
be gathered in
the workplace
wherever
possible. Where
no workplace is
available, a
simulated
workplace must
be provided
-
the evidence
collected must
relate to a
number of
performances
assessed at
different points
in time and in a
learning and
assessment
pathway these
must be
separated by
further learning
and practice
-
assessment
meets the rules
of evidence
-
a judgement
of competency
should only be
made when the
assessor is
confident that
the required
outcomes of the
unit have been
achieved and
that consistent
performance has
been
demonstrated
|
| Specific
evidence
requirements must
include: |
|
|
| Integrated
assessment means
that: |
|
|
|